<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Episode 56 of Upon Further Review!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.furtherreview.net/2008/03/05/episode-56-of-upon-further-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.furtherreview.net/2008/03/05/episode-56-of-upon-further-review/</link>
	<description>Where two ex-debaters get the last word...on EVERYTHING.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 01:29:07 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: classic chris</title>
		<link>http://www.furtherreview.net/2008/03/05/episode-56-of-upon-further-review/#comment-27890</link>
		<dc:creator>classic chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 05:37:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.furtherreview.net/2008/03/05/episode-56-of-upon-further-review/#comment-27890</guid>
		<description>hey!  thought everyone might find this interesting on the subject of homeopathy:
Â£10,000 offered for proof homeopathy works
Professor Edzard Ernst says he will award Â£10,000 to the first person who can show the controversial treatment is better than a placebo in a scientifically controlled trial. Calling on homeopaths to 'put up or shut up', Professor Ernst said there was still no strong evidence that the method - whose fans include Prince Charles and Hollywood celebrities - was effective.
see www . unexplained - mysteries . com for the full story... :-)

- chris</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey!  thought everyone might find this interesting on the subject of homeopathy:<br />
Â£10,000 offered for proof homeopathy works<br />
Professor Edzard Ernst says he will award Â£10,000 to the first person who can show the controversial treatment is better than a placebo in a scientifically controlled trial. Calling on homeopaths to &#8216;put up or shut up&#8217;, Professor Ernst said there was still no strong evidence that the method - whose fans include Prince Charles and Hollywood celebrities - was effective.<br />
see www . unexplained - mysteries . com for the full story&#8230; :-)</p>
<p>- chris</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: classic chris</title>
		<link>http://www.furtherreview.net/2008/03/05/episode-56-of-upon-further-review/#comment-25913</link>
		<dc:creator>classic chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2008 00:41:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.furtherreview.net/2008/03/05/episode-56-of-upon-further-review/#comment-25913</guid>
		<description>What a show, G&#38;C!

Sorry to hear your puppy isn't doing well.  Hope she gets well soon, whatever the treatment.  I agree w/ ii:  homeopathy seems counterintuitive.  I understand though, though, having a gaggle of pets myself (2 dogs, 4 cats, 2 birds, 3 aquariums and a koi pond, plus feeding anywhere from 4 - 12 stray cats), that sometimes you just want to exhaust all possibilities.  

Personally, I think Colbert's extreme, over-the-top style is what makes him hilarious, especially when he interviews people (the ones that 'get it', as you put it).  I have to disagree, though, that his show is just a parody, as that makes it seem kind of empty or a total joke.  I believe that while he takes things to the extreme that there is substance and values behind the show, same as the Daily Show (which I love, also) takes things to the extreme, but also has substance and values behind it.  Personally, what I like about Colbert's show is that it isn't afraid to laugh at itself, whereas Stewart does a wonderful job, but sometimes takes himself and the show a little too seriously and gets in his own way.

Thanks, again, for an awesome time!  See you on 57!

- Chris</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a show, G&amp;C!</p>
<p>Sorry to hear your puppy isn&#8217;t doing well.  Hope she gets well soon, whatever the treatment.  I agree w/ ii:  homeopathy seems counterintuitive.  I understand though, though, having a gaggle of pets myself (2 dogs, 4 cats, 2 birds, 3 aquariums and a koi pond, plus feeding anywhere from 4 - 12 stray cats), that sometimes you just want to exhaust all possibilities.  </p>
<p>Personally, I think Colbert&#8217;s extreme, over-the-top style is what makes him hilarious, especially when he interviews people (the ones that &#8216;get it&#8217;, as you put it).  I have to disagree, though, that his show is just a parody, as that makes it seem kind of empty or a total joke.  I believe that while he takes things to the extreme that there is substance and values behind the show, same as the Daily Show (which I love, also) takes things to the extreme, but also has substance and values behind it.  Personally, what I like about Colbert&#8217;s show is that it isn&#8217;t afraid to laugh at itself, whereas Stewart does a wonderful job, but sometimes takes himself and the show a little too seriously and gets in his own way.</p>
<p>Thanks, again, for an awesome time!  See you on 57!</p>
<p>- Chris</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: idiosyncratic idiot</title>
		<link>http://www.furtherreview.net/2008/03/05/episode-56-of-upon-further-review/#comment-25310</link>
		<dc:creator>idiosyncratic idiot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 20:56:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.furtherreview.net/2008/03/05/episode-56-of-upon-further-review/#comment-25310</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I must agee with you about Mr. Colbert - he's often too exaggerated, over-the-top; I prefer Jon's subtetly much better (although I find him funny too).
The one thing I truly like about him is the coinage of neologisms (truthiness!).

Now when it comes to homeopathy... I haven't made any research about it so please disconsider my opinion when I say it sounds like total bs. I mean, it is hard to believe that a substance being diluted more and more to the extent that there is barely of it causes more effect... it doesn't make sense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I must agee with you about Mr. Colbert - he&#8217;s often too exaggerated, over-the-top; I prefer Jon&#8217;s subtetly much better (although I find him funny too).<br />
The one thing I truly like about him is the coinage of neologisms (truthiness!).</p>
<p>Now when it comes to homeopathy&#8230; I haven&#8217;t made any research about it so please disconsider my opinion when I say it sounds like total bs. I mean, it is hard to believe that a substance being diluted more and more to the extent that there is barely of it causes more effect&#8230; it doesn&#8217;t make sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Media Districts Entertainment Blog &#187; Episode 56 of Upon Further Review!</title>
		<link>http://www.furtherreview.net/2008/03/05/episode-56-of-upon-further-review/#comment-24817</link>
		<dc:creator>Media Districts Entertainment Blog &#187; Episode 56 of Upon Further Review!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 00:03:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.furtherreview.net/2008/03/05/episode-56-of-upon-further-review/#comment-24817</guid>
		<description>[...] Upon Further Review &#194;&#187; Where two ex-debaters get the last word&#226;€&#166;on EVERYTH... placed an observative post today on Episode 56 of Upon Further Review!Here&#8217;s a quick excerpt [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Upon Further Review &Acirc;&raquo; Where two ex-debaters get the last word&acirc;€&brvbar;on EVERYTH&#8230; placed an observative post today on Episode 56 of Upon Further Review!Here&#8217;s a quick excerpt [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
