http://www.furtherreview.net/2006/07/09/clarifying-things-about-podshow/ Where two ex-debaters get the last word...on EVERYTHING. Wed, 17 Mar 2010 23:14:09 -0700 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 http://www.furtherreview.net/2006/07/09/clarifying-things-about-podshow/comment-page-1/#comment-24 admin Mon, 10 Jul 2006 18:35:39 +0000 http://www.furtherreview.net/?p=18#comment-24 UPDATE: We`ve now talked with Adam Curry several times, and it looks as if changes are rapidly being implemented to address the concerns we brought up in our initial post (or rather to address the concerns of hundreds of our fellow podcasters, to be fair--lots of people had the same problems!). We`re still not overly pleased at being listed initially at Podshow+ without our consent, but we`re willing to accept that it wasn`t considered a deliberately sleazy act at the beginning. Obviously we`ll continue to monitor the situation, and we`ll still have something to say about it on tomorrow`s show, but it will be a heck of a lot milder than it would have been a couple of days ago. :)  We do appreciate Adam`s responsiveness in addressing the situation--it bodes well for the future success of Podshow+ if they follow through on his assurances. T.R. UPDATE: We`ve now talked with Adam Curry several times, and it looks as if changes are rapidly being implemented to address the concerns we brought up in our initial post (or rather to address the concerns of hundreds of our fellow podcasters, to be fair–lots of people had the same problems!). We`re still not overly pleased at being listed initially at Podshow+ without our consent, but we`re willing to accept that it wasn`t considered a deliberately sleazy act at the beginning. Obviously we`ll continue to monitor the situation, and we`ll still have something to say about it on tomorrow`s show, but it will be a heck of a lot milder than it would have been a couple of days ago. :)  We do appreciate Adam`s responsiveness in addressing the situation–it bodes well for the future success of Podshow+ if they follow through on his assurances.
T.R.

]]> http://www.furtherreview.net/2006/07/09/clarifying-things-about-podshow/comment-page-1/#comment-23 admin Mon, 10 Jul 2006 07:30:21 +0000 http://www.furtherreview.net/?p=18#comment-23 Yep--even the mega directories don`t handle things this way. I`m not sure how this is all going to play out, but it`s good to know that we`re not the only ones who are really, REALLY irritated at this apparent land grab. We`ve left a comment on Adam Curry`s weblog entry about Podshow+, though, asking him to remove us from the directory and explain what happened...if he responds to that request reasonably (and affirmatively :) ), we`d probably be willing to give him the benefit of the doubt. T.R. Yep–even the mega directories don`t handle things this way. I`m not sure how this is all going to play out, but it`s good to know that we`re not the only ones who are really, REALLY irritated at this apparent land grab. We`ve left a comment on Adam Curry`s weblog entry about Podshow+, though, asking him to remove us from the directory and explain what happened…if he responds to that request reasonably (and affirmatively :) ), we`d probably be willing to give him the benefit of the doubt.
T.R.

]]> http://www.furtherreview.net/2006/07/09/clarifying-things-about-podshow/comment-page-1/#comment-22 Rob S Sun, 09 Jul 2006 18:57:23 +0000 http://www.furtherreview.net/?p=18#comment-22 I agree with your sentiments and have talked about these and other issues related to the re-distribution of podcasts on my blog at http://www.podcastnyc.net/blog. I agree with your sentiments and have talked about these and other issues related to the re-distribution of podcasts on my blog at http://www.podcastnyc.net/blog.

]]>